lux-royalty-beauty-enhancements · L3 - Massage · Decatur (Southeast)
Current Option Inventory (Units and GB are quarter-to-date rollups from 2026-04-01)
| Option | List | Sell | Effective Margin | Units QTD | GB QTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Lymphatic Massage Session with LED Infrafred Light + Wood Therapy | $165.00 | $82.50 | 0.0% | 0 | $0.00 |
| 5 Lymphatic Drainage Massages with LED Infrared Light + Wood Therapy | $775.00 | $387.50 | 0.0% | 0 | $0.00 |
| 10 Lymphatic Drainage Massages with LED Infrared Light + Wood Therapy | $1,600.00 | $656.00 | 0.0% | 0 | $0.00 |
| 15 Lymphatic Drainage Massages with LED Infrared Light + Wood Therapy | $2,375.00 | $950.00 | 0.0% | 0 | $0.00 |
Activity Timeline (sorted newest first)
- 2025-05-08 Price change on 5 Lymphatic Drainage Massages with LED Infrared Light + Wood Therapy — $217.00 → $271.25 analysed below
- 2025-05-02 Price change on 1 Lymphatic Massage Session with LED Infrafred Light + Wood Therapy — $44.55 → $56.10 analysed below
3-Comparison — 5 Lymphatic Drainage Massages with LED Infrared Light + Wood Therapy lux-royalty-beauty-enhancements
Price: $217.00 → $271.25
Windows: 30 days before change, 30 days after, same period last year, and peer-cohort change. "Δ vs Peer" is market-relative: deal's before→after change minus peers' before→after change. Positive = deal outperformed market. Negative = peers improved more than the deal did.
| Metric | Before 30d | After 30d | Δ vs Before | YoY | Δ vs YoY | Peer Δ (bf→after) | Δ vs Peer | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVR | 0.1% | 0.1% | -1.1% | 0.0% | n/a | -24.4% | +23.3% | didnt work |
| GB/UDV | $0.13 | $0.14 | +12.4% | $0.00 | n/a | -14.6% | +26.9% | |
| MVR/UDV | $0.03 | $0.02 | -27.3% | $0.00 | n/a | +7.5% | -34.7% |
3-Comparison — 1 Lymphatic Massage Session with LED Infrafred Light + Wood Therapy lux-royalty-beauty-enhancements
Price: $44.55 → $56.10
Windows: 30 days before change, 30 days after, same period last year, and peer-cohort change. "Δ vs Peer" is market-relative: deal's before→after change minus peers' before→after change. Positive = deal outperformed market. Negative = peers improved more than the deal did.
| Metric | Before 30d | After 30d | Δ vs Before | YoY | Δ vs YoY | Peer Δ (bf→after) | Δ vs Peer | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVR | 0.3% | 0.1% | -65.4% | 0.0% | n/a | +28.0% | -93.5% | didnt work |
| GB/UDV | $0.11 | $0.05 | -56.5% | $0.00 | n/a | +26.6% | -83.0% | |
| MVR/UDV | $0.02 | $0.01 | -47.6% | $0.00 | n/a | +281.3% | -328.9% |
SF Context
Churn-threat classification from sales cases and tasks: sf data insufficient
No churn-threat keywords detected in recent cases or tasks.