essentials-massage-and-facials-of-spring-hill-8  ·  L3 - Massage  ·  Brooksville (Southeast)

Owner: Lucas McGrew  ·  Manager: Jake Moore  ·  Division: Tampa  ·  Stage:  ·  PDS: Massage - Relaxation

Current Option Inventory (Units and GB are quarter-to-date rollups from 2026-04-01)

OptionListSell Effective MarginUnits QTDGB QTD
50 Minute Relaxation Massage w Hot Stone Aromatherapy Sugar Scrub Deluxe Facial $184.99 $140.00 25.0% 10 $1,400.00
50-Min Relax Massage w HotStone Aromatherapy Sugar Scrub Dlux Facial Reflexology $185.00 $145.00 25.0% 7 $1,015.00
50-Minute Relaxation Massage w/ Hot Stone, Aromatherapy, & SugarScrub $135.00 $87.75 25.0% 20 $1,755.00
50-Minute Relaxation Massage w Hot Stone Aromatherapy SugarScrub and Reflexology $150.00 $97.50 25.0% 7 $682.50

Activity Timeline (sorted newest first)

Signing signals (blue) are recent SF task completions or opportunity field changes — they may precede the margin/price shift appearing in billing data, because only vouchers sold AFTER the signing date bill at the new rate.

3-Comparison — 50-Minute Relaxation Massage w Hot Stone Aromatherapy SugarScrub and Reflexology essentials-massage-and-facials-of-spring-hill-8

Change anchor: 2025-05-07  ·  350d since change
Price: $79.00 → $97.50

Windows: 30 days before change, 30 days after, same period last year, and peer-cohort change. "Δ vs Peer" is market-relative: deal's before→after change minus peers' before→after change. Positive = deal outperformed market. Negative = peers improved more than the deal did.

Metric Before 30dAfter 30dΔ vs Before YoYΔ vs YoY Peer Δ (bf→after)Δ vs Peer Verdict
CVR 1.5% 1.2% -20.2% 0.0% n/a +17.6% -37.8% worked
GB/UDV $1.24 $1.51 +21.7% $0.00 n/a +17.6% +4.0%
MVR/UDV $0.15 $0.23 +55.3% $0.00 n/a +24.5% +30.7%

3-Comparison — 50-Minute Relaxation Massage w/ Hot Stone, Aromatherapy, & SugarScrub essentials-massage-and-facials-of-spring-hill-8

Change anchor: 2025-04-30  ·  357d since change
Price: $76.00 → $87.75

Windows: 30 days before change, 30 days after, same period last year, and peer-cohort change. "Δ vs Peer" is market-relative: deal's before→after change minus peers' before→after change. Positive = deal outperformed market. Negative = peers improved more than the deal did.

Metric Before 30dAfter 30dΔ vs Before YoYΔ vs YoY Peer Δ (bf→after)Δ vs Peer Verdict
CVR 4.3% 5.5% +29.2% 0.0% n/a +31.9% -2.7% didnt work
GB/UDV $3.68 $5.33 +45.0% $0.00 n/a +31.5% +13.4%
MVR/UDV $0.55 $0.81 +47.7% $0.00 n/a +325.6% -277.9%
Promo-spend flag. GB/UDV improved but MVR/UDV did not — gains were likely absorbed by ILS / push campaigns. Investigate promo attribution before concluding the change worked.

SF Context

Churn-threat classification from sales cases and tasks: sf data insufficient

No churn-threat keywords detected in recent cases or tasks.

0 recent case(s) and 0 recent task(s) in 730-day lookback.