chinese-reflexology-massage  ·  L3 - Massage  ·  Oklahoma City (South Central)

Owner: Edgar Eduardo Montes de Oca Carranza  ·  Manager: Edgar Rolando Flores Davila  ·  Division: Oklahoma City  ·  Stage:  ·  PDS: Massage - Couples

Current Option Inventory (Units and GB are quarter-to-date rollups from 2026-04-01)

OptionListSell Effective MarginUnits QTDGB QTD
60-Minute Custom Foot Reflexology with Chinese Herbal Soak $100.00 $50.00 0.0% 0 $0.00
Couples 70-Minute Deluxe Body Massage w/Hot Stone & Chinese Herbs Soap Treatment $360.00 $180.00 25.0% 5 $900.00
Couples 60-Minute Deluxe Body Massage with Hot Stone Treatment $280.00 $140.00 25.0% 8 $1,120.00
60-Minute Deluxe Body Massage with Hot Stone Treatment $140.00 $70.00 25.0% 8 $560.00
70-Minute Deluxe Body Massage with Hot Stone and Chinese Herbs Soap Treatment $180.00 $90.00 25.0% 2 $180.00

Activity Timeline (sorted newest first)

Signing signals (blue) are recent SF task completions or opportunity field changes — they may precede the margin/price shift appearing in billing data, because only vouchers sold AFTER the signing date bill at the new rate.

3-Comparison — 60-Minute Deluxe Body Massage with Hot Stone Treatment chinese-reflexology-massage

Change anchor: 2025-05-28  ·  329d since change
Price: $60.00 → $70.00

Windows: 30 days before change, 30 days after, same period last year, and peer-cohort change. "Δ vs Peer" is market-relative: deal's before→after change minus peers' before→after change. Positive = deal outperformed market. Negative = peers improved more than the deal did.

Metric Before 30dAfter 30dΔ vs Before YoYΔ vs YoY Peer Δ (bf→after)Δ vs Peer Verdict
CVR 2.8% 2.0% -27.6% 0.0% n/a -17.6% -10.0% worked
GB/UDV $1.66 $1.40 -15.5% $0.00 n/a -12.7% -2.9%
MVR/UDV $0.21 $0.22 +7.4% $0.00 n/a -35.8% +43.2%

3-Comparison — Couples 60-Minute Deluxe Body Massage with Hot Stone Treatment chinese-reflexology-massage

Change anchor: 2025-05-28  ·  329d since change
Price: $110.00 → $140.00

Windows: 30 days before change, 30 days after, same period last year, and peer-cohort change. "Δ vs Peer" is market-relative: deal's before→after change minus peers' before→after change. Positive = deal outperformed market. Negative = peers improved more than the deal did.

Metric Before 30dAfter 30dΔ vs Before YoYΔ vs YoY Peer Δ (bf→after)Δ vs Peer Verdict
CVR 3.2% 2.7% -16.1% 0.0% n/a -9.8% -6.3% inconclusive
GB/UDV $3.56 $3.80 +6.8% $0.00 n/a +8.4% -1.6%
MVR/UDV $0.56 $0.56 +1.0% $0.00 n/a +9.1% -8.0%
Promo-spend flag. GB/UDV improved but MVR/UDV did not — gains were likely absorbed by ILS / push campaigns. Investigate promo attribution before concluding the change worked.

SF Context

Churn-threat classification from sales cases and tasks: sf data insufficient

No churn-threat keywords detected in recent cases or tasks.

0 recent case(s) and 0 recent task(s) in 730-day lookback.